Evaluation of full-length nanopore 16S sequencing for detection of pathogens in microbial keratitis.

Low, Liying, Fuentes-Utrilla, Pablo, Hodson, James, O'Neil, John D, Rossiter, Amanda E, Begum, Ghazala, Suleiman, Kusy, Murray, Philip I, Wallace, Graham R, Loman, Nicholas J and Rauz, Saaeha (2021) Evaluation of full-length nanopore 16S sequencing for detection of pathogens in microbial keratitis. PeerJ, 9. e10778. ISSN 2167-8359. This article is available to all UHB staff and students via ASK Discovery tool http://tinyurl.com/z795c8c by using their UHB Athens login IDs

[img]
Preview
Text (PDF file format)
peerj-09-10778.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (3MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://peerj.com/articles/10778/

Abstract

Background

Microbial keratitis is a leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide. Conventional sampling and culture techniques are time-consuming, with over 40% of cases being culture-negative. Nanopore sequencing technology is portable and capable of generating long sequencing reads in real-time. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of nanopore sequencing directly from clinical samples for the diagnosis of bacterial microbial keratitis.

Methods

Using full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequences from a defined mock microbial community, we evaluated and benchmarked our bioinformatics analysis pipeline for taxonomic assignment on three different 16S rRNA databases (NCBI 16S RefSeq, RDP and SILVA) with clustering at 97%, 99% and 100% similarities. Next, we optimised the sample collection using an ex vivo porcine model of microbial keratitis to compare DNA recovery rates of 12 different collection methods: 21-gauge needle, PTFE membrane (4 mm and 6 mm), Isohelix SK-2S, Sugi Eyespear, Cotton, Rayon, Dryswab, Hydraflock, Albumin-coated, Purflock, Purfoam and Polyester swabs. As a proof-of-concept study, we then used the sampling technique that provided the highest DNA recovery, along with the optimised bioinformatics pipeline, to prospectively collected samples from patients with suspected microbial keratitis. The resulting nanopore sequencing results were then compared to standard microbiology culture methods.

Results

We found that applying alignment filtering to nanopore sequencing reads and aligning to the NCBI 16S RefSeq database at 100% similarity provided the most accurate bacterial taxa assignment. DNA concentration recovery rates differed significantly between the collection methods ( < 0.001), with the Sugi Eyespear swab providing the highest mean rank of DNA concentration. Then, applying the optimised collection method and bioinformatics pipeline directly to samples from two patients with suspected microbial keratitis, sequencing results from Patient A were in agreement with culture results, whilst Patient B, with negative culture results and previous antibiotic use, showed agreement between nanopore and Illumina Miseq sequencing results.

Conclusion

We have optimised collection methods and demonstrated a novel workflow for identification of bacterial microbial keratitis using full-length 16S nanopore sequencing.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article is available to all UHB staff and students via ASK Discovery tool http://tinyurl.com/z795c8c by using their UHB Athens login IDs
Subjects: QA Mathematics. Computing
WW Eyes. Ophthalmology
Divisions: Clinical Support
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Mrs Yolande Brookes
Date Deposited: 04 Mar 2021 11:49
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2021 11:49
URI: http://www.repository.uhblibrary.co.uk/id/eprint/4050

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item