Is the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey representative? A comparative analysis with the National Lung Cancer Audit.

Nartey, Yvonne, Stewart, Iain, Khakwani, Aamir, Beattie, Vanessa, Wilcock, Andrew, Woolhouse, Ian, Beckett, Paul, Hubbard, Richard B and Tata, Laila J (2020) Is the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey representative? A comparative analysis with the National Lung Cancer Audit. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 140. pp. 27-34. ISSN 1872-8332. Available through UHB Open Athens

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://www.lungcancerjournal.info/article/S0169-5...

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare systems increasingly recognise the importance of service users' perspectives for improving care organisation and delivery. The English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) is carried out annually, however, its representativeness within cancer types is unknown. We have explored if the CPES results are representative of people with lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We linked cancer registry data across multiple sources to assess how CPES represents sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the National Lung Cancer Audit population, accounting for post-sampling mortality bias. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare people included and not included in CPES.

RESULTS

Of 240,375 people diagnosed (2009-2015), 15,967 (7 %) were included in CPES. Gender and ethnicity were reasonably represented, as were sociodemographic and clinical groupings, although more received anti-cancer treatment (96 % of CPES respondents vs. 56 % of patients nationally; adjusted odds ratio = 10.3, 95 % confidence interval 9.4-11.2 for any anti-cancer treatment) with chemotherapy most over-represented, followed by surgery and then radiotherapy. CPES under-represented older, more socioeconomically deprived, and certain clinical groups, including those with worse performance status, multiple comorbidities, and diagnosis via emergency presentation.

CONCLUSION

CPES includes patients across the sociodemographic and clinical spectrum indicating its value for research and service planning. Unbalanced representation of incident lung cancer cases is a limitation that must be considered in context of using CPES findings to implement service changes. Although half the national lung cancer population who received no anti-cancer treatment do not have their experiences represented, the strength of this dataset is in providing detailed comparisons of patient experiences across different treatment groups.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Available through UHB Open Athens
Subjects: QZ Pathology. Oncology
WF Respiratory system. Respiratory medicine
Divisions: Planned IP Care > Oncology and Clinical Haematology
Planned IP Care > Respiratory Medicine
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Beth Connors
Date Deposited: 15 Apr 2021 11:30
Last Modified: 15 Apr 2021 11:30
URI: http://www.repository.uhblibrary.co.uk/id/eprint/4213

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item