Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group.

Swallow, Carol J, Strauss, Dirk C, Bonvalot, Sylvie, Rutkowski, Piotr, Desai, Anant, Gladdy, Rebecca A, Gonzalez, Ricardo, Gyorki, David E, Fairweather, Mark, van Houdt, Winan J, Stoeckle, Eberhard, Park, Jae Berm, Albertsmeier, Markus, Nessim, Carolyn, Cardona, Kenneth, Fiore, Marco, Hayes, Andrew, Tzanis, Dimitri, Skoczylas, Jacek, Ford, Samuel J, Ng, Deanna, Mullinax, John E, Snow, Hayden, Haas, Rick L, Callegaro, Dario, Smith, Myles J, Bouhadiba, Toufik, Stacchiotti, Silvia, Jones, Robin L, DeLaney, Thomas, Roland, Christina L, Raut, Chandrajit P and Gronchi, Alessandro (2021) Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group. Annals of surgical oncology. ISSN 1534-4681.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-0...

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document.

METHODS

The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation.

RESULTS

Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: QZ Pathology. Oncology
WO Surgery
Divisions: Planned IP Care > General Surgery
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Mrs Yolande Brookes
Date Deposited: 25 Apr 2021 14:11
Last Modified: 25 Apr 2021 14:11
URI: http://www.repository.uhblibrary.co.uk/id/eprint/4254

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item