A comparative analysis of noncontrast flow-spoiled versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease.

Tools

Kassamali, Rahil Hussein, Hoey, Edward T D, Ganeshan, Arul and Littlehales, Tracey (2013) A comparative analysis of noncontrast flow-spoiled versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 19 (2). pp. 119-25. ISSN 1305-3612.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.dirjournal.org/text.php3?id=508

Abstract

Initial results show good agreement between FBI-MR angiography and Gd-MR angiography in the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease, making FBI a potential alternative in patients with renal impairment. FBI showed highest accuracy in the above knee vessels. Technological refinements are required to improve accuracy for assessing the calf and pedal vessels.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WN Medical imaging. Radiology
Divisions: Clinical Support > Radiology
Depositing User: Preeti Puligari
Date Deposited: 26 Apr 2013 14:55
Last Modified: 15 May 2013 08:58
URI: http://www.repository.uhblibrary.co.uk/id/eprint/90

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UHB Repository is powered by EPrints 3.4 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. About EPrints | Accessibility